|
camel-with-3-humps 12:01 Tue Nov 10
Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
|
Should be a cracking fight. Dubois certainly has the X factor. I was at the fight when he pummelled Nathan Gorman.
But Joyce is a man mountain. Unbeaten as well.
This is a true test for Dubois. Thoughts boxing fans?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
3:16 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Obviously Dubois wins, particularly bearing in mind the age difference. However, if there's a rematch, Joyce gets him every time with the final chapter soliloquy.
|
Block
3:06 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
I hope Dubois demolishes Joyce, the cocky odd looking cunt.
|
Mr Kenzo
10:18 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Good to hear unlike that cunt Eddie Hearn
|
Bright Eyes
10:10 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Kenzo, it’s being shown on standard BT sport - Frank Warren did the right thing and wanted to maximise exposure.
|
Mr Kenzo
9:28 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Is it free or is the Boxing game going to mug the supporters off with a Box Office premium again to watch it?
|
Hermit Road
8:10 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Dubois, comfortably.
Joyce is slow and easy to hit and Dubois can hit hard.
|
gph
2:55 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Dublinois, surely...
|
lowlife
2:33 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Dubois in the 7th. Joyce looks too slow and mechanical to make it any higher than this level.
|
Takashi Miike
1:30 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Dubois has the superior jab, and I think wins with a late stoppage
|
,
12:12 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
Shaw or Kipling might have put up good fights with James Joyce.
|
camel-with-3-humps
12:06 Tue Nov 10
Re: Dubois v James Joyce - NOV 28
|
JOE JOYCE
Apologies for the name error
|
|
|
|
